Welcome to PlagueFest.com! Log in or Sign up to interact with the Plague Fest community.
  1. Welcome Guest! to interact with the community and gain access to all the site's features.

AMD R9 Nano Performance Indirectly Revealed – More Compute Power Than A Titan X

Discussion in Hardware Hangout started by Dr.Tommy Oliver, Jun 21, 2015

  1. Feb 5, 2013
    Posts
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Dec 30, 2006
      Posts
      Why is your title so long?
      • Agree Agree x 1
      • Feb 5, 2013
        Posts
        Ask the author who wrote the damn thing.
      • Apr 9, 2012
        Posts
        Finally, the series I'm going to buy.
      • Feb 5, 2013
        Posts

        AMD just whoop Nvidia ass with the new R9 cards.
      • Mar 20, 2011
        Posts
        Might as well have a nuclear power plant with any AMD cards. The consume soo much power, I had three 290r's and sent them back, too much heat, too much power draw. I do like AMD's video processing much better than Nvidia though.
        • Like Like x 1
        • Jan 21, 2011
          Posts

          [IMG]

          30 watts difference between the nano and the 970...
        • Mar 20, 2011
          Posts
          I am talking about the Fury X. Anyways AMD always hogs power like no tomorrow, if AMD got more power efficient I would buy one.
        • Feb 5, 2013
          Posts

          You do not need a nuclear power plant to run AMD cards. The new AMD cards require 500watt or less to run on the PC.
        • Mar 20, 2011
          Posts

          I ran three r290x's and they where drawing over 4Kw of juice on a load, yeah you need a nuclear power plant or an endless wallet.
        • Feb 5, 2013
          Posts
          Um, no you don't need a nuclear power plant to run three AMD cards. You might need huge power supply watt, but not a nuclear power.
        • Jan 21, 2011
          Posts
          Are hyperbole's lost on you or something?
          • Agree Agree x 1
          • Feb 5, 2013
            Posts

            Dude, this is the Internet you should know people are too serious to make hyperbole's.
          • Feb 5, 2013
            Posts

            To answer your question, no Hyperbole's are not lost on me.