Welcome to PlagueFest.com! Log in or Sign up to interact with the Plague Fest community.
  1. Welcome Guest! to interact with the community and gain access to all the site's features.

Upper Admins please, is my spray correct?

Discussion in Help Desk started by mathroy3, Oct 19, 2012

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Apr 3, 2011
    Posts
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • Jun 20, 2012
      Posts
      I'm no longer an admin (Sigh, I never have time to play anymore although i stalk the forums to see what peeps are up to..) But i specifically remember your spray and agreeing with another admin at the time that it was legal since it had not below the waist nudity. Just my 2 centz
    • Dec 6, 2011
      Posts
      We also do not allow any type of porn spray, along with below the waist nudity. I doubt that females rub each other in certain places as daily, non-sexual activities. I would say this spray has to go (as I've warned you for it in the past, but glad you came to the forums instead of argued in-game).

      No inappropriate sprays.
      (top)
      This includes but is not limited to:
      • Porn:
        Depictions of explicit sex acts.
        Below the waist nudity.
    • Feb 14, 2012
      Posts
      Those two girls are touching each other in a special area and my dick is rather hard now BRB.
      • Wizard! Wizard! x 1
      • Good Idea Good Idea x 1
      • Oct 29, 2010
        Posts
        Definitely a borderline one, technically Brett is in the right here, though I definitely see why it's been passed up by others.
        • Agree Agree x 3
        • Mar 12, 2008
          Posts
          I see no penis, vagina, child porn, or animals/people getting fucked. This is allowed, however, only slightly. If her legs were spread open, that is a definite no-no.
        • Mar 30, 2012
          Posts
          Why would any mature person even have that as a spray.
          Is it to gain attention? Cause drama?
          I don't get it.
        • Feb 18, 2011
          Posts
          As Momo said it is borderline, It really just depends on the admin who sees it.
        • Dec 6, 2011
          Posts
          But sexual acts is also in the rules so technically this is a "definite no-no".

          Unless we alter the rules, I don't see how this can be argued otherwise.
        • Jan 11, 2012
          Posts
          Why does it always have to be porn sprays? Why not a nice tree?
          • Like Like x 1
          • Agree Agree x 1
          • Mar 30, 2012
            Posts
            Did someone say "a tree"?
            [IMG]
            • Funny Funny x 1
            • Mar 12, 2008
              Posts

              There's always a grey area. It's better to simply ask them not to spray it then it is to outright have them change it by kicking them. It's literally "On the fence". You could yell at that player "LOOK SHARP LIVE SMART" or whatever his/her name is. He/she censors out their pictures with a very, very small GQ logo over the offending parts. It might as well not even be there. Those are very borderline, but they aren't hurting anyone, and i haven't heard complaining (yet), so I see no reason to pursue that as of now.

              In this particular case, though, it would be more or less the same. I agree with your argument of depiction of sexual acts.
              it is super borderline. If she looks like she was obviously "going at it" with her partner there, I would instantly call red flag on that. Knowing that the general IQ of our playerbase is sub-standard however, I see no reason not to refine this in the rules, as i'm sure someone will try to find a way around it sooner or later.


              [IMG]
              • Artistic Artistic x 1
                Taters, Oct 20, 2012 Last edited by Taters, Oct 20, 2012
              • Apr 9, 2012
                Posts
                I would be personally be ashamed to even ask this on the forums, despite it being 'on the border'
              • Mar 12, 2008
                Posts
                At least he's asking. I prefer it this way, as he can get a good opinion on whether or not he can defend his right to spray this without fear of action being taken against him.

                Trust me, I wish everyone would do it this way. A+ to him.
              • Feb 21, 2007
                Posts
                agree with momo.
                • Agree Agree x 1
                • Dec 6, 2011
                  Posts
                  It's funny @Taters I actually told LOOK SHARP LIVE SMART how to censor his sprays lol, but the reason they're fine is that all of them are just solo photos, or non-sexual acts.

                  I guess it's whatever you guys want to enforce, but I don't see why somebody would go through the trouble of just trying to keep a spray...
                • Feb 14, 2012
                  Posts
                  You just want to see hotties finger each other.

                  Sent from my SGH-I747M using Tapatalk 2
                • Nov 11, 2011
                  Posts
                  Damn it... I saw the link on my phone, came on the computer to fap and this is what I get:

                  [IMG]

                  And if I saw that spray in the server, I would not warn you for it. Now if her hands were a little bit above and was revealing some vag... then I would warn you. I see nothing wrong with that picture.
                • Dec 6, 2011
                  Posts
                  Pretty sure it's more than just nudity below the waist, which nobody is understanding.

                  • Like Like x 1
                  • Jul 20, 2010
                    Posts
                    Well Brett is right that it's showing a sexual act which is something that is included in the rule. We all know whats going on in that picture unless people are just being stupid about it o.O
                  Thread Status:
                  Not open for further replies.