Welcome to PlagueFest.com! Log in or Sign up to interact with the Plague Fest community.
  1. Welcome Guest! to interact with the community and gain access to all the site's features.

A simple circumscision gone wrong.

Discussion in Everything & Anything started by ck27, Sep 25, 2008

Search This Thread
Advanced Search
  1. ck27
    Veteran
    Dec 30, 2006
    1,306
    Posts
    Link below:


    http://www.wlky.com/health/17550187/detail.html


    Major lol. Well not for the guy.
    ck27, Sep 25, 2008
    #1
  2. retslag1
    Management
    Feb 21, 2007
    6,232
    Posts
    lol? someone forgot to inform him of the risks!!
    retslag1, Sep 26, 2008
    #2
  3. xXPhantom59Xx
    Member
    Jul 16, 2008
    475
    Posts
    damn sucks to be him
    xXPhantom59Xx, Sep 26, 2008
    #3
  4. Brian
    Management
    Jun 4, 2006
    8,838
    Posts
    man he's not gonna be using that thing anyway, who cares.
    Brian, Sep 26, 2008
    #4
  5. Josh
    Veteran
    Mar 16, 2008
    4,505
    Posts
    sucks for Paula now :S
    Josh, Sep 26, 2008
    #5
  6. Sig.
    Member
    May 24, 2008
    1,120
    Posts
    Thank god I never actually needed to get a circumscision...
    Sig., Sep 26, 2008
    #6
  7. Liberius
    Member
    Jan 7, 2008
    199
    Posts
    Most guys don't even realize they were circumcised at birth. I mean...If your penis is the only one you've ever seen...then how do you know? MOST guys don't go around examining other guys' penises...at east as far as I know. (this thread is going to go to hell now)

    I'm not sure(might wanna ask Ret), but isn't circumcision at birth normal practice these days(unless otherwise requested by the parents)?
    Liberius, Sep 26, 2008
    #7
  8. Peter
    Veteran
    May 27, 2008
    4,585
    Posts
    It is. I think doctors ask if the parents want them to circumcise the newborn.
    Peter, Sep 26, 2008
    #8
  9. ck27
    Veteran
    Dec 30, 2006
    1,306
    Posts
    well i was reading circumcision is becoming less and less popular because it is more healthy i thought to have a uncircumcised penis. Maybe it is the other way around i dont remember. I dont think ill be looking into it either.

    That would be a nice surprise at the doctors.

    Wake up
    "OMG wheres my penis!"
    ck27, Sep 26, 2008
    #9
  10. Peter
    Veteran
    May 27, 2008
    4,585
    Posts
    *doctor is wiggling it around in his hand*
    Peter, Sep 26, 2008
    #10
  11. retslag1
    Management
    Feb 21, 2007
    6,232
    Posts
    well, I have seen other guy's penis'...lol.....but ya, circumcision is the standard these days. 2 things tho: even tho most everyone gets a circumcision, it is still asurgical procedure, and the parent must sign consent for it (meaning they can refuse, and the kid remains uncircumcised), and 2. this guy was born a long long time ago (IMO before much of real medicine was around) and thus, it maybe wasn't as standard practice back then.

    And ck, the jury is still out on that one. I mean, for the better part of at least the last 20-30 yrs, the standard thought has been that cirumcision is healthier/better...but there is some research which says this may not be true. IMO, I just think remaining uncircumcised poses more risk for infection underneath the foreskin. If you think about the area, it can remain fairly wet after urination or sex, with the latter containing tons of bacteria. So I would think that would just set up more of a risk for infection. Not sure if there is research proving this, but thats just my logical reasoning.
    retslag1, Sep 26, 2008
    #11
  12. Taters
    Member
    Mar 12, 2008
    4,329
    Posts
    at least it didn't hurt :grin:

    i think the circumscision is a lot more safer because its less of a mess after sex and whatnot.
    plus it looks like a saggy hotdog if it isn't. amirite?


    so... my 2 cents.
    Taters, Sep 26, 2008
    #12