Got some abuse for you.

Well I wasn't even going to bother with this but when I joined back from being banned for 20 minutes(For blowing a bridge and killing 3 people) I got proceeded to be called an asshole and a faggot by Mr.p1nk..Great admin right..I have 2 demos of him admin abusing...Everything is going to be in the chat log so just watch that. He freezes and slays CT's, Kicks a random guy for blowing the bridge when he didnt and yada yada you'll see for yourself...In the second demo He calls me what I said above and you'll also see for yourself...Email me here if you want the demos so you can watch them..Thank you

Upload and provide a link, please.

I'm not one to report stuff...But when a admin threatens to ban me for "600 years" for no reason...They can take a hike..here you go

My link
My link

Well In my professional opinion, six hundred years is not only an exaggeration, or as I like calling it, web slang for permanent ban.

If an admin also set a rule for not blowing up a bridge, you listen to him. Griefing teammates is a definite don't do in my book. I'm not at home, so I cannot review this, but still will try to when I return tomorrow.

also, it helps if you submit the abuse correctly.

Well blowing the bridge is a pretty common thing... It still shouldn't be a bannable offense though since it does gives a 5 second warning to get off.Me getting banned for 20 minutes wasn't even that big of a deal to me because i know what I did (Although a simple kick would of served the situation better). it was the fact an admin with no provoking would call me an asshole, fag, and basically say he's going to perma ban me because I called him out on admin abuse and he supposedly "Owns the server". Muting teams, Freezing CT's then slaying them, Kicking random people and saying " don't blow up the bridge douche" when they had no part in it. Just after this thread I went back in and somebody got "slapped" like 50 times repeatedly. I don't know if the person asked for it or not but still. The demo's will pretty much explain for themselves. I don't care much about what you guys do about it I just hate to see a good server get ruined by a guy who wants his AUTHORITAH to be respected when he cant even respect the players...And for some reason the demo's have a lot of lag..The first one only goes about half way. You get to see most of the stuff I mentioned though.

Anyways, after having seen both demos, it's clear that you were trying to provoke him (by blowing up the bridge, and constantly rub it on his face that you were taking a demo of it all). But I do think that there were some instances where he did do something he wasn't supposed to (e.g.: claim the server to be his -- but then again, it could have been just a typo, or he could have been through some stress because the server was loud, annoying and clearly out of control, or he doesn't speak English well-enough: we could definitely see that his English isn't perfect when he types; anyways, by also freezing an entire team and ultimately killing them, that was uncalled for, unnecessary, and to top it all off by laughing at it...), I don't know. Those are just my 2 cents on this (if anyone cares lololol)

Also, what's up with the ban reason being "mins". Is that supposed to mean anything? I mean there are no comments left beside it or anything that can tell us why the ban was even made to the 2 members...

In regards of the ban reason he made a mistake i think entering the command to ban someone , i can't even view the demo myself as i dont have the map <_<

If done repeatedly, this is considered griefing and is punishable.

So.... you knew that an admin might take issue with you doing what you did, yet you did it anyway?

I agree with you (from what I saw in the demos) that mr. p1nk's reaction was inappropriate. We like to see people warned before actions like a kick/ban are initiated. I can see that the situation was mishandled somewhat and will talk to mr. p1nk about it.

The logs will be reviewed on this one - thank you for bringing it to our attention.

This topic is ::locked:: unless someone else has anything else to add (after reviewing the logs or demos, of course.)

Discussion had with mr. p1nk. We're good.