Welcome to PlagueFest.com! Log in or Sign up to interact with the Plague Fest community.
  1. Welcome Guest! to interact with the community and gain access to all the site's features.

Removing sprays

Discussion in Counter-Strike: Source started by ::1/128, Mar 13, 2011

  1. Oct 27, 2010
    Posts
    I remember seeing a topic about this in the past and for all i know there may now be a command for such this now, but can we have a remove spray command for admin? I was on ZM2 and someone had a child pornography spray. I tried to find who had it, but they had spray it on top of about three other spray so @spray did not work. I cautioned everyone about such sprays and did not see the spray again. Having the ability to remove sprays would be useful should such an incident occur in the future. As a follow up question, should such a spray be an automatic permaban, i thought that it might as that has been my experience in other similar forums? If such a command already exists I apologize in advance for my incompetence. Thank you.
  2. Oct 29, 2010
    Posts
    We used to have it, not sure why we don't anymore.
  3. Aug 13, 2010
    Posts
    I blame momo for the removal.
  4. Oct 27, 2010
    Posts
    Well I assume the logistics are complicated, but i really do feel as though it would be an invaluable addition in cases such as this. While my spray managed to cover the offensive one, I have noticed that it doesn't always work like that.
  5. Feb 1, 2010
    Posts
    If you dont want to see sprays type this in console:

    cl_playerspraydisable 1

    :wink:
  6. Feb 21, 2007
    Posts
    We will wait for Kyle or Josh to post in here....
  7. Oct 22, 2010
    Posts
    as admins we have to see sprays, we have rules and we are here to enforce them.
  8. Oct 27, 2010
    Posts


    I understand this, but what i think would be helpful is the ability to remove individual sprays from everyone's view, like in the case of a child pornography spray.
  9. Apr 9, 2007
    Posts
    Caused Crashes, I haven't messed with it since.
  10. Oct 22, 2010
    Posts
    127, my comment was to google, i understand the point of this topic, and i agree would be a good idea to have the ability to remove "disturbing/innapropriate" sprays from view of our community.

    but for now, we will have to just monitor it as best as we can, warn the offender, and cover up said sprays with your own spray.
  11. Feb 15, 2011
    Posts
    When I was admin a long time ago, I remember I used it. I think it was something like sm_removespray but it looks disabled here :smile:
  12. Nov 14, 2010
    Posts
    Fix this command! :grin:

    sm_removespray & @removespray
    Would be quite helpful.
    If it causes crashes, then it must be fixed.
  13. Oct 22, 2010
    Posts
    well shit, if bella likes the idea, i can't support it...

    i kid, i kid
  14. Oct 10, 2010
    Posts
    why you allow sprays?
    they mostly porn and such shit.

    disable it wit

    sv_allowupload 0
  15. Feb 21, 2007
    Posts
    fix it and then give the new version to kyle to upload...
  16. Mar 16, 2008
    Posts
    Would save us from a lot of problems lol; I've considered it in the past but I fear people would rage at me if I did lol;
  17. Feb 12, 2011
    Posts
    Sprays are useless and stupid most of the time.
    There are some sprays that are funny, but come on would you rather just have some funny sprays or get rid of the problem of offensive sprays.
  18. Oct 10, 2010
    Posts
    lol

    we disabled sprays since years, and nobody know it
    cause people who spray, see they own spray - only others not.

    and trusted people or admins can send spray file to us for upload to server,
    so all see it

    but yes, it really solves a lot of problems.
    i did this method first since i saw - like threadstarter - child porn spray.
  19. May 27, 2008
    Posts
    I agree with this. We should do it because sprays don't give users any sort of advantage over each other.
  20. Apr 9, 2007
    Posts
    Removing Sprays would remove individuality, which is why I haven't done it in the past. We can disable uploads for clients who are not registered and turn it into a 'donor thing' to work around this. Although, I'm not sure what the outcome would be. Surely members are going to bitch saying it's a terrible idea. But still, it's something to entertain.